In function of these usual evaluations, it has in the miditicas ranks a presentation of information with responsibility? It wants in them to seem that not. Let us illustrate. Aristotle already dealt with the subject of the responsibility has 500 years B.C. approximately At the time where virt wrote on the Republic understood the necessity of the factor reverse speed-publishes x. Kept the ratios, times and main sources of the study appealed to higher court, since the awareness of the aristotelian republic always he had the necessity of the absolute imperative of the guarantee, or that ' ' informadores' ' inside of a republican state (democratic in our days) he had to respect and to preserve in full and integral way the basic rights them citizens. the right to the true information, as one of them, since the most remote times, always was evidenced.

Clearly that all these partner-legal criteria had evolved with elapsing of the time, as is the case of the citizenship in its diverse phases, leaving of the ideas of Marshall and reaching a citizenship ' ' forte' ' , that it fights for its rights. In our days, cliente we are, of our much more complex reality. Of any way, as we can worthy oppose veracity and current information propagated on the subject, cotejando them with a right consecrated constitutionally to the information? Where it is to such aristotelian virtue in our days? Perhaps the virtue, as bigger idea of responsibility, can yes be applied the aged inhabitants of the region of the accident, whom if they deny to leave its residences for the simple fact to believe that if thus making they will be acting against the proper national conscience. In its soul, the removal of the region would try a discredit in the government and the protection that the democratic attribute to the Japanese regimen confers.