You are currently browsing the TJSFF posts tagged: the public


Youth Policy

The older generation of young people criticized for laxity and indifference to life, and much more for that. Of course, problems in the youth subculture is not small, ranging from the boorish behavior of some members and ending with their go beyond the edge of the laws, committing crimes. Most young people can not be arranged in life, there are no jobs and affordable housing. The problems of contemporary Russian society, we all know. The question is, what the root cause of these evils, what will happen if it does not stop. Man is formed in society. Youth is inherently neither progressive nor conservative, it is – potentially, ready for any undertaking.

But what is the initiative and Who laid? If in Soviet times, the ideals for the younger generation have been astronauts, pilots and representatives of other courageous and necessary professions, but now the situation is different. According to a study conducted by All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VTsIOM) young people aged 18-24 believe their ideals of pop stars, members of the "golden" youth (52%), successful businessmen and oligarchs (42%). These "bright images" formed by the influence of the media. It is the media on a subconscious level we impose a certain view of life style. We say we have democracy, we are free to choose the path of development as the country as a whole and the personal. But this illusion! We have a choice only within the framework of the system in which we live. And there are no dramatic improvements. It's like in the bourgeois elections: in the race may be involved at least ten games, but they end eventually work for the ruling elite, regardless of the color of flags and slogans on the leaflets.

Europe Advisory Committee

In other words, the capacity of the Azeri population, qualitative and quantitative, calls for a natural outlet for optimal living space, but instead of natural stimuli like include mechanisms of artificial restraint. At the same time do not contribute to the normal existence of society, and other "extraneous circumstances". "After the 2008 war border between Georgia and Russia closed completely, and the Georgian Azerbaijanis lost their markets for products. As a result, unemployment has risen sharply, "- said held a press conference in Baku, Azerbaijani Deputy Chairman of People's Movement "Geyrat" Zyumrud Gurbanov. And he complained that in the last year for earnings of Georgia had to travel more than 60 thousand of Azerbaijanis. Most went to their historic homeland, but also in Azerbaijan, they faced with problems – in particular, we are talking about immigration procedures and other formalities. It would seem that the requirements of the Council of Europe Advisory Committee meets the desire of the Armenian population, compact living in Javakheti Armenian language to give a regional status. This issue is addressed in one of his speeches and Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan.

But even here there are problems. Georgian authorities for such concessions amounted to encourage separatist sentiment in the compact-populated areas, and the same applies to the Kvemo Kartli region. In fact, the creation of normal conditions for a more fulfilling life and manifestations capacity for self can and should evoke a sense of gratitude to the authorities and make life easier for people considerably. State Minister for Reintegration Temur Yakobashvili in response to the (proposed) Sargsyan inappropriate sarcasm, his usual, decided to emphasize that in Armenia, the Armenian language has the status of the state, and the same shall be in Georgia. However, Armenia – mono-ethnic state, unlike Georgia, where regionality has a long sensitive, which should be considered. Especially in a country building a democratic society.

Doing otherwise, Georgia for more than a year, reaping the benefits of the course, which is inherited from the times the first president of independent country, Zviad Gamsakhurdia. Once upon a time, Georgia was unified and powerful – certainly not autonomous entities, and it seemed to him that, in the autonomy of independent Georgia, could be abolished easily and painlessly. These "disastrous enclaves" saw him as a vestige of the traditions of Russian tsarist great power, as embodied cunning and treacherous Stalinist regime. And the first president, instead, to show care and earn the trust of multi-ethnic society, and in the first place – the national minorities and make enjoy the confidence of the Abkhaz, Ossetians, and others who make up the glorious historical community, agitated the country extremely dangerous and foolish acts.